Modern Australian

Frydenberg should call a no-holds-barred inquiry into superannuation now, because Labor won't

  • Written by Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University

The Coalition is running out of time to do worthwhile things.

Facing overwhelming odds of defeat in the election due within weeks, one of its last throws of the dice should be to do something Labor would never do, but which is urgently needed and would set us on the right course for the future.

It’d also cause some trouble for Labor along the way.

It is to launch a full-blown inquiry into the superannuation system Labor has lumbered us with.

Frydenberg should call a no-holds-barred inquiry into superannuation now, because Labor won't Source: Australian Tax Office It’s urgent because compulsory super contributions are scheduled to climb from the current 9.5% of salary to 12%, beginning with an increase of 0.5% in July 2021, followed by an extra 0.5% in 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025. If that seems rapid, and painful, it is because it is due to happen at twice the rate it has been. Under the schedule imposed by Labor when it was last in office compulsory contributions were to climb by 0.25% of salary in each of 2013 and 2014 and then at twice the rate, by 0.5%, in each of the five years after that. Compulsory super is set to jump.. The Coalition hit pause after 2014 just before the rate accelerated, postponing the series of five much bigger increases until 2022, when it might have hoped that wage growth would be robust enough to cope with it, or when it would have been someone else’s problem. Labor says it will stick to that schedule, presumably regardless of wage growth or other economic conditions or the need for extra super contributions at the time. Asked, ahead of the release of the Productivity Commission’s report on how to make super funds more efficient, whether Labor would reconsider the schedule if the Commission found other ways to boost retirement incomes, Labor Treasury spokesman Chris Bowen said it would not. It’s almost as if – to Labor – lifting compulsory super contributions has the status of a holy writ; perhaps because it would “complete the work” of Labor elder statesman Paul Keating who introduced compulsory super, or perhaps because so many union officials are tied up with the running of the funds that would benefit from the schedule of increases. In the event the Productivity Commission report released on January 10 found ways to massively lift retirement incomes without lifting super contributions. …whether we need it or not It found unintended multiple accounts and the defaulting of new workers into entrenched underperforming funds were costing members an astonishing A$3.8 billion per year. Weeding out the chronic underperformers, clamping down on unwanted multiple accounts and insurance policies, and letting workers choose funds from a short menu of good ones and stay in them for life would give the typical worker entering the workforce an extra A$533,000 in retirement. Even a typical worker aged 55 today would get an extra A$79,000 in retirement. What the Commission’s report couldn’t say, but stongly implied, was that if the Commission’s recommendations were adopted an increase in costly compulsory contributions might not be necessary. Its terms of reference limited it to assessing the “efficiency and competitiveness” of what happened to the contributions that were collected. Henry was unconvinced Another inquiry – less hamstrung – was the Henry Tax Review. It found no need to increase contributions. Labor treasurer Wayne Swan dishonoured its findings by announcing the proposed increase in contributions on May 2, 2010, the day he released its report. But super wasn’t the main focus of the Henry Review. In the 25 year history of compulsory super, there has never been an inquiry into what the rate should be and what the system has achieved. It’s as if governments of both types have been keen to govern blindly. So in January the Productivity Commission tentatively ventured beyond its brief, in a recommendation Treasurer Josh Frydenberg has promised to respond to before the election. It is Recommendation 30, for an independent inquiry into the entire system. Frydenberg should call a no-holds-barred inquiry into superannuation now, because Labor won't The independent inquiry would determine whether or not the system we’ve had for the past 25 years has boosted national or even private savings rates, as well as who it has hurt and who it has helped. They are the type of questions you would think a government would want to answer before lifting compulsory contributions further from 9.5% of salary to 12%. Frydenberg could show leadership… Indeed, Recommendation 30 explicitly asks that the inquiry “be completed in advance of any increase in the superannuation guarantee rate”. It is possible to guess what the inquiry would find: that almost all increases in employers’ compulsory super contributions come out of what would have been wages, depressing workers take home pay, a finding that will not be seriously disputed that the system hasn’t boosted national savings - the increase in private savings has been offset by the decrease in government savings brought about by the use of the super tax concessions that the increase in private savings has come almost entirely from the middle to low earners who have been unable to escape the impact of the levy, because they have had no other savings they could cut. They are the people who could least afford to save more at the time they were forced to the tax benefits have gone overwhelming to the high earners who are saving no more than they would have without them, and without compulsion In sum, the inquiry is likely to find that the system is regressive and cruel. Or perhaps not. We won’t know until it is held. It ought to be conducted by an expert panel whose members are highly respected and who will amass evidence the next government won’t be able to ignore. …ensuring Labor does more than look after mates Frydenberg ought to appoint the panel now, or within weeks, so that an incoming Labor government can’t dismantle it. It would be one of his most important legacies. And would give him something to press the next government about should he be in opposition. In time an incoming Labor government might thank him. At present, without the scheduled increases in compulsory super, wage growth is just 2.3%. With the scheduled increases of 0.5 percentage points per year, wage growth might fall below the rate of inflation, for five consecutive years. No sensible treasurer would allow that happen. By doing what’s right, Frydenberg might be giving Bowen an out. Read more: Productivity Commission finds super a bad deal. And yes, it comes out of wages

Authors: Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University

Read more http://theconversation.com/frydenberg-should-call-a-no-holds-barred-inquiry-into-superannuation-now-because-labor-wont-114079

NEWS

The campaign with built-in R&R for voters

Politically speaking, the Easter break is a blessing for a jaded electorate, at least a partial rest for voters’ eyes and ears in a campaign that’s started as an impossibly...

the 'ball-tampering' budget trick they don't want you to know about

Just not cricket: Politicians make promises but obfuscate how those promises will be paid for.ShutterstockThe first week of the federal election campaign has been dominated by heated disputes about the...

three things to consider if you're thinking about homeschooling your child

Homeschooling allows more creativity in the way the curriculum is delivered.Max Goncharov/UnsplashThis is the last article in our series on homeschooling in Australia. The series answers common questions including why...

Adani, economics and personality politics

The Adani coal mine has become a key issue for voters.Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-NDOur “state of the states” series takes stock of the key issues, seats and policies affecting...

Antibiotic shortages are putting Aboriginal kids at risk

At any time, almost one in two Aboriginal children living in remote areas will have a school sore. That means right now, there are an estimated 15,000 children needing treatment.School...

What and where is heaven? The answers are at the heart of the Easter story

Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-NDThis is the second in a two-part series on heaven and hell by Bible scholar Robyn Whitaker. You can read her piece on hell here.My pious...

What is hell, exactly? We might joke it's other people, but the Bible has a more complicated answer

Hell is a complicated idea- and most Christians do not believe it has anything to do with fire and brimstone.Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC BY-NDThis is the first in a two-part...

In Abdul-Rahman Abdullah's Pretty Beach, a fever of stingrays becomes a meditation on suffering

Abdul-Rahman Abdullah, Pretty Beach, 2019, installation view, The National 2019: New Australian Art, Museum of Contemporary Art Australia, Sydney, painted wood, silver plate ball chain, crystals, audio, image courtesy the...

Going to the beach this Easter? Here are four ways we're not being properly protected from jellyfish

Thousands of Queensland beachgoers have been stung by bluebottle jellyfish in recent monthsShutterstockThe Easter long weekend marks the last opportunity this year for many Australians to go to the beach...

a tale of amazing people, amazing creatures and rising seas

We have so much more to learn about Australia.Shutterstock/Lev SavitskiyThe Australian continent has a remarkable history — a story of isolation, desiccation and resilience on an ark at the edge...

how we value the fruits of our labour over instant gratification

The IKEA effect says 'that labour alone can be sufficient to induce greater liking for the fruits of one’s labour'.ShutterstockThere are some anecdotes just so good that almost every story...

Climate change is hitting hard across New Zealand, official report finds

Finance minister Grant Robertson (left) and climate minister James Shaw address school children during a climate protest, promising that New Zealand will introduce zero carbon legislation this year. AAP/Boris Jancic...

Popular articles from Modern Australian

Downsizing: What Is Too Small?5 unique ways to extract toxins from your bodyThe Art Of Bell-RingingModern Snapback Hats trending in Australia6 Mistakes to Avoid When Moving Overseas5 Tips Designed to Help Accentuate Your Hourglass FigureRoyal Edinburgh Military TattooThe inaugural Bondi Ocean Lovers FestivalHow to Plan a Remodeling at Home: Tips and TricksAchieving Facial Symmetry with RhinoplastyHow to Choose the Best Colors for Your BedroomFind Here the 3 Best Online Pokies in AustraliaHair Loss and Transplant SolutionsHere's All You Need For An Exuberant Cocktail PartyHow to Find Your Signature Style