Modern Australian

Another official Australian report has been doctored to gloss over rising inequality

  • Written by Peter Saunders, Research Professor in Social Policy, UNSW

First it was the Bureau of Statistics. It produced an notoriously bland press release headed “Inequality stable since 2013-14” when its own analysts had told it there had been a “significant increase” in wealth inequality since 2011–12, that wealth inequality was “at its peak” since it was first measured, and that there had been “a significant downward change” in the wealth share of the bottom fifth of Australian households.

Another official Australian report has been doctored to gloss over rising inequality The analyst who penned the note about the significant downward change added, in what appears to have been a plea for guidance: “I’m not sure that we want to draw attention to this though??”. Another official Australian report has been doctored to gloss over rising inequality We know this only because of emails released by the Bureau of Statistics in response to a Freedom of Information request. Christopher Sheil and Frank Stilwell drew attention to it in The Conversation and then went on to suggest that the Productivity Commission might have also been downplaying the growth in wealth inequality by producing its own bespoke measure at odds with others. Read more: It's not just the ABS. It's also the Productivity Commission downplaying the growth in inequality I am not convinced that the Productivity Commission did downplay the growth in wealth inequality, but that doesn’t mean sensitivity about inequality isn’t widespread in official circles, apparently including, as I will outline, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. First, the Productivity Commission. Sheil and Stilwell present a chart showing the Commission’s 2017 report to be “the odd man out” among five studies – the only one to show a decline in the share of wealth going to the top 10% between 2013-14 and 2015-16. Productivity Commission understandable But on the graph presented by the Productivity Commission itself the decline is miniscule. The PC study also measured a different thing to the other studies: so-called equivalised wealth, which is wealth adjusted for household size and composition. This isn’t the place to argue the merits of the PC approach (I have problems with it), merely to note that if the PC’s findings were substantially different from other findings, it might be because it was measuring something different. Read more: Inequality is growing, but it is also changing as Australia's super rich evolve This isn’t the case for what happened two years ago at the government-funded Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. Institute for Health and Welfare inexplicable Another official Australian report has been doctored to gloss over rising inequality Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Every two years since 1993 the AIHW has produced a report that presents reliable and detailed information about the need for and provision of welfare services such as aged care, child care, education, housing and disability services. Every two years since 1993 the Australian Institute for Health and Welfare (AIHW) has produced a report that presents reliable and detailed information about the need for and provision of welfare services such as aged care, child care, education, housing and disability services. I was involved in early discussions about the structure and content of Australia’s Welfare and have been asked (with others) to comment on draft chapters prior to release. In 1999 I contributed a chapter. I spoke at its launches in 1997 and 2005. I am a strong supporter of the AIHW and of its work. In recent years it has added an overview of Australia’s welfare progress over a wide range of dimensions using a framework that covers 15 key indicators divided into seven themes. It summarises recent changes in each indicator and indicates whether they are, on balance, favourable or unfavourable, or whether there has been no change or no clear trend. Another official Australian report has been doctored to gloss over rising inequality Australia's Welfare 2017, table 9.2.2 One of the themes is material living conditions. The second of its three indicators is income inequality. Another official Australian report has been doctored to gloss over rising inequality "Errata Slip", AIHW Table 9.2.2 summarises the changes between 2003-04 and 2013-14 as “unfavourable”. Yet when I received my hard copy of that report in mid-November 2017, I was surprised to find a loose-leaf insert inside the front cover headed “Errata slip,” dated October 11, 2017. An errata is usually a list of factual errors and corrections. This one dealt not with factual errors but contained what were essentially three changes to the way in which income inequality was described, all of them the same. In each case a phrase like this was removed The difference between household income levels in the highest and lowest income quintiles has nearly doubled from 1994-95 to 2013-14 and replaced by one like this While the distribution of income in Australia has shown little change in recent years, income inequality has risen since the mid-1990s as measured by the Gini coefficient. Each quintile contains one-fifth of the population, where the top quintile contains those with the highest incomes and the bottom contains those with the lowest incomes. The statement that has been replaced is correct. The difference between household income levels in the highest and lowest income quintiles had nearly doubled between 1994-95 and 2013-14. But it has been expunged from the version of the report that can be downloaded from the AIHW website, even though careful readers will note that one instance of it still survives unexpurgated on page 355. Another official Australian report has been doctored to gloss over rising inequality The one that got away, marked in yellow. Australia's Welfare 2017, page 355 The changes struck me as weird at the time. Errata are normally reserved for correcting or removing gross errors of fact discovered after printing. In this case, the changes simply replaced a factually correct statement of what the data showed (that income inequality had gone up substantially) with one that was far more qualified. I find it inconceivable that those responsible for producing such a well-researched, meticulously-checked, authoritative and extensively assessed (internally and externally) report would, at this very late stage, have decided to insist on the change themselves. Read more: Don't believe what they say about inequality. Some of us are worse off So did the Institute give in to external pressure to conform and fall in behind the (incorrect) government line that income inequality hasn’t grown? It’s hard to think of another explanation. If this is the case, what the Institute did is made it easier for the Bureau of Statistics to dilute the message of its own statistics two years later. Even stranger still… One of the most bizarre aspects of this whole episode is that the current government has been actively pursuing policies designed to increase inequality – at least in the short-run – through substantial tax cuts for those at the top, and resistance to raising Newstart for those at the bottom. Both have been justified on the grounds that widening income gaps will increase incentives to work and save and encourage more Australians to “have a go”. It thus seems odd for the government to try to suppress or alter information that shows two of its policies working as planned, if that’s what’s happened here. Read more: There's a reason you're feeling no better off than 10 years ago. Here's what HILDA says about well-being We need reliable and accurate data on inequality in order to monitor all aspects of our progress and tell whether programs are working as intended. Massaging presentations to make it look as if less is happening than actually is doesn’t serve public policy well. The agencies that provide this data must abide by the strongest possible standards to ensure the integrity of their data. As far as is known, they do. But those standards have to extend to the presentation of their data. Without that, we will become less than we are, and we will have less idea of what we are doing.

Authors: Peter Saunders, Research Professor in Social Policy, UNSW

Read more http://theconversation.com/another-official-australian-report-has-been-doctored-to-gloss-over-rising-inequality-123091

NEWS

Vital Signs. Might straight down the middle be the source of our economic success?

Australian roads are straight, as has been the trajectory of our economic policy for more than 30 years.ShutterstockWhat do a billionaire, a former vice president, and a US democratic socialist...

Research funding announcements have become a political tool, creating crippling uncertainty for academics

There’s a lot of uncertainty in a research career. Most funding – and most jobs – are doled out by the project, or in chunks of a few years at...

Friday essay: shaved, shaped and slit

In ancient China, India and the Middle East, the art of eyebrow threading was popular. It is now enjoying a resurgence.www.shutterstock.comEyebrows can turn a smile into a leer, a grumpy...

Public places through kids' eyes – what do they value?

One nine-year-old chose his local supermarket as a place he valued because he could "spend time with mum and help decide what goes in our trolley".ShutterstockChildren are too rarely asked...

New research shows Chinese migrants don't always side with China and are happy to promote Australia

Australian media coverage of China can feel alienating to Chinese migrants, but most still hold a positive view of their adopted country.Lukas Coch/AAPThe Australian government has indicated that “diaspora communities”...

Is your teen off to schoolies? Here's what to say instead of freaking out

Schoolies is a rite of passage for many Australian teenagers as they finish their exams and leave school. But are you prepared?from www.shutterstock.comFor many parents whose teenage children are completing...

Australia must engage with nuclear research or fall far behind

Nuclear power will likely remain part of the global energy mix. ioshimuro/Flickr, CC BY-NCMuch is made of the “next generation” of nuclear reactors in the debate over nuclear power in...

When the firies call him out on climate change, Scott Morrison should listen

When five former fire chiefs held a news conference on Thursday to urge the federal government to take more action on climate change, it was a challenging moment for Scott...

how holograms and other tech could help outsmart bushfires

In many countries including America, computer models are being used to predict how a fire will burn.Author providedAustralia continues to experience unprecedented destruction from bushfires. Now is the time to...

Alison Croggon and the arts critic as an endangered species

The work of a first-rate critic can be as important to our appreciation and understanding of a work of art (or performance) as the immediate experience itself.ShutterstockReview: Platform Papers 61:...

Minister David Littleproud on bushfires, drought, and the Nationals

Bushfires continue to burn across NSW and Queensland, the death toll has risen, and the damage to properties, wildlife and the environment is devastating. With conditions predicted to worsen over...

How we plan for animals in emergencies

Residents evacuate themselves and their animals to a park in Old Bar, NSW, Saturday, November 9, 2019.AAP Image/Darren PatemanAnimals are desperately vulnerable to natural disasters. An estimated 350 koalas have...

Popular articles from Modern Australian

4 Vaccines Your Teens Should Be GettingStrength Training Tips To Make Your Workout EffectiveTop Fashion Secrets To Look Stylish No Matter The Occasion  How to save money on major home repairsCan I Do Something About My Sensitive Teeth?Climbing Out of a Creative Rut – Strategies for Photographers5 Digital Free Holidays: Take a trek and get back to nature8 Things You’ll Need for a Positive Breast Surgery RecoveryThe Best Sites and Events to See in Melbourne Everything You Wanted To Know About Air CompressorsWhat to Consider When Buying a Home With KidsPlaces to visit on your first trip to North AmericaHow to Choose the Best Driving InstructorMust-Visit US Destinations for AustraliansFive Reasons You Should Consider Concrete Furniture