Modern Australian

Voices of residents missing in a time of crisis for public housing

  • Written by David Kelly, PhD Candidate, Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University

The 30% increase in the number of homeless people between the 2006 and 2016 censuses is likely to continue in the absence of evidence-based public housing policy. We need to rapidly extend public housing and services, according to housing and homelessness research.

Read more: Homeless numbers will keep rising until governments change course on housing

Despite this research, the common approach by governments, in Australia and overseas, is to adopt a program of “renewal” and “regeneration” funded by the transfer of public lands to private hands. Housing estates are sold, transferred or redeveloped in partnership with a private developer. This often results in a shift of social housing dwellings from 100% publicly owned to mixed forms of tenure.

For public housing residents, being told that their estate is to be “renewed” is destabilising and can cause extreme stress. A lack of clarity about relocation timelines and processes compounds this.

Voices of residents missing in a time of crisis for public housing The Northcote housing estate in Melbourne occupies prime real estate along Merri Creek. David Kelly

Similar issues in Sydney, Melbourne and London

Residents’ acceptance of this “renewal” approach varies greatly. While some are happy with the promise of a new home, opposition is growing in Australia and internationally.

The main issues being contested are planning approaches, consultation processes and the loss of public land overseen by housing authorities steering estate regeneration.

In Sydney, the government’s Communities Plus program is redeveloping public housing assets and land through partnerships with not-for-profit and private developers.

The City of Melbourne recorded a 74% increase in the numbers of people sleeping rough between 2014 and 2016. Opposition to the government’s public housing renewal program is now growing in Melbourne. The government is relocating residents from nine inner-city housing estates, demolishing homes and transferring public land to private developers.

Read more: Why should the state wriggle out of providing public housing?

In London, Harringey Council is working with Australian developer Lendlease to transfer over £2 billion in council assets, including several housing estates across the borough. In response, the Stop-HDV campaign is challenging the partnership and lack of community consultation through direct action, political campaigning, media representation and an ongoing legal challenge.

Opposition is fuelled by the redevelopment of the Heygate estate in Elephant and Castle. This has resulted in the loss of over 1,000 social housing units at council rental rates.

Affordable housing stock, rented at 80% of the standard market rate, replaced social housing. This makes it difficult for low-income residents to return to the estate.

Residents struggle to be heard

While government and developers undertake forms of consultation, residents affected by renewal repeatedly report that their voices are not being heard. This poses major problems for the reception of viable alternatives presented to development authorities by residents.

At a local scale, residents work to find other ways to make their voices heard. Visible across Sydney, a community light sculpture at the Waterloo estate expressed residents’ feelings about the redevelopment of their homes through coloured lights.

Read more: We Live Here: how do residents feel about public housing redevelopment?

Other responses to regeneration by estate residents include theatre, book writing, spoken word and street art.

Voices of residents missing in a time of crisis for public housing Graffiti protests against the sale of the Northcote estate. David Kelly

In Melbourne, the government claims the “renewal” of the nine estates will result in an increase of 180 (10%) public housing dwellings.

This claim requires closer scrutiny. On the Northcote estate, for example, there are 85 dwellings with 201 bedrooms. According to a government-commissioned report from September 2017, the public component of the redevelopment will have 96 properties with 139 bedrooms. That’s an 11% increase in dwellings, but a 31% decrease in bedrooms.

Even if the overall number of public housing bedrooms increased by 10%, this would not be enough. According to the Victorian Housing Register, in December 2017 there were over 36,000 applications for public housing and over 7,000 waiting for more adequate housing.

Alternatives need to be heard

One of the underpinning assumptions made by government is that dispersing disadvantage will lead to better outcomes for public housing residents.

This, and the resulting social mix, is the rationale for the program. This assumption is completely flawed. It imagines a fallacy of trickle-down socioeconomics achieved through minimal government spending.

Voices of residents missing in a time of crisis for public housing A boarded-up public housing residence on the Northcote estate. David Kelly

Academic experts and public housing resident activists continually express their objections to the rhetoric of renewal. Kate Shaw, an urban geographer with expertise in housing and planning, says:

Pretty much everything about the program in its current approach is wrong.

Read more: Social mix in housing? One size doesn't fit all, as new projects show

Delegates at a December 2017 public housing forum in Melbourne called on the government to impose a moratorium on the process so alternatives can be heard. Yet voices continue to be ignored.

Read more: Governments have no excuse for keeping public in the dark on public housing deals

The progressive rhetoric of renewal obscures the displacement of residents, the fragmentation of lives and the privatisation of the public realm. Narratives of improvement drown out objections by residents and the wider public. Any argument against renewal is falsely equated with an argument against improving the lives of public housing residents.

This misdirection infects the public discourse around housing more generally. We are witnessing the complete reorganisation of the home. We think of homes as exchangeable stock.

For residents of public housing estates, the public realm is home, and home is a place of sanctuary and respite. The voices of residents need to be to the fore in the conversation if evidence-based public housing policy is to prevail. Retaining public places should be of interest to all who count themselves as part of the public.

This article was written in conversation with public housing advocate and resident William Gwynne. The author thanks William for his integral insights.

Authors: David Kelly, PhD Candidate, Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University

Read more http://theconversation.com/voices-of-residents-missing-in-a-time-of-crisis-for-public-housing-93655

NEWS

NZ workplace study shows more than quarter of employees feel depressed much of the time

Many workers are exposed to work environments that leave them feeling depressed and burnt out.from www.shutterstock.com, CC BY-NDAccording to the World Health Organisation (WHO), the workplace can be a positive...

'We all slept in the car, five of us'. Young refugees talk about being homeless in Australia

There is help available for young refugees who find themselves homeless in Australia, if only they can find it.Supakit Wisetanuphong/ShutterstockOne of the biggest challenges young people of refugee background face...

It will be money, not morality, that finally turns the tide on Alan Jones

The perception of Jones' power has led to him being courted by politicians, and so wielding actual power.AAP/Joel CarrettAlan Jones’s political power is to a large extent based on a...

our continuing upward redistribution of wealth

The results of the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics biennial survey of income and wealth met have met with an uneven response, perhaps in part due to a slipshod press...

why we need to cut emissions as well as prepare for impacts

Research shows the cost of damage through climate change will be much greater than the costs of reducing emissions.from www.shutterstock.com, CC BY-NDCC BY-NDClimate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation...

Tarantino has a questionable record in the #MeToo context, so should we boycott his new film?

'I left the cinema pondering the confusing range of emotions and responses I had.' Andrew Cooper/Sony Pictures EntertainmentThis story contains spoilers for Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.While promoting Once...

Australian universities can't rely on India if funds from Chinese students start to fall

A new report says Australia's universities are too reliant on income from Chinese students.Shutterstock/Nils VersemannAustralia’s leading universities are now looking to India in search of new sources of international students...

Bungled NZ census highlights need for multiple voting options to raise Māori participation

New Zealand's 2018 census was the first to be carried out online, but it captured only 83% of people, a response rate 9% lower than the previous census. Māori responses...

Will eating chicken reduce your risk of breast cancer?

While this research has merit, it doesn't exactly tell us eating chicken reduces risk of breast cancer. From shutterstock.comResearch Checks interrogate newly published studies and how they’re reported in the...

Free speech or sky vandalism? Here's what the law says about skywriting in Australia

'Choose life' was scrawled across the sky last Sunday and again today as abortion legislation is debated in the NSW upper house.A small plane looped through the tranquil and cloudless...

What should politicians be reading at parliamentary book club? Our experts make their picks

You might picture a book club around your neighbour’s coffee table, or over beers at the local pub – but what if it took place in Parliament House? This is...

Youth discounts fail to keep young people in private health insurance

Many young people see private health insurance as an unnecessary expense.Yuricazac/ShutterstockIt was a key plank of what was dubbed the most significant package of private health insurance reforms in more...

Popular articles from Modern Australian

How to stay healthy and live your best lifeThe berry that can make you look younger10 Benefits of Clinical PilatesThe Process Followed by Car Removal Companies5 Ideas for Small Melbourne BackyardsSplurge or Save: Our tips on what to Spend the Big Money on for your Wedding5 ways to make sure you have a good camping tripMouth Ulcer Treatment – The Easiest It Can GetLaser Treatment For Skin Tag RemovalThe Importance of Mental Health During PregnancyFavourite Pastimes for SeniorsHow to Dress for Work: Chic 9-5 StyleFind out how reading Funeral Poems can bring comfort to your griefWhat Men Like in Women’s FashionDocument you need for a divorce