Modern Australian
Sunday, July 20, 2025 7:38:27 PM
Men's Weekly

.

Where should the law draw the line between consent and culpability in sadomasochism?

  • Written by Jarryd Bartle, Sessional Lecturer in Criminal Law, RMIT University
Where should the law draw the line between consent and culpability in sadomasochism?

The worldwide #MeToo movement has brought with it a new platform to discuss the intricacies of human relationships and sexual consent. Key to these discussions is an understanding of when and how the criminal law recognises formal consent to sexual acts.

However, a far more surprising legal distinction also exists: when are sexual acts so extreme that consent is irrelevant?

In 1987, the UK Metropolitan Police discovered what they thought was a snuff film, depicting acts of violence and abuse of a group of young men. Some years later, the House of Lords upheld the conviction of five men who inflicted the horrible injuries. Problem was, the “victims” in this case never filed a complaint – indeed they asked to be injured.

The men convicted were not thugs, but hedonists, entering into a consensual sado-sexual arrangement with a group of younger men, all of whom consented to the acts performed.

The resulting decision of R v Brown is an infamous piece of legal history, establishing the legal precedent that certain “extreme” consensual acts – like heavy sadomasochistic activity – can be criminalised even without a victim complaint.

Read more: Yes means yes: moving to a different model of consent for sexual interactions

In Australia, how the law might interpret consent in situations like this is far from clear. In the current climate around sexual relations, the Australian High Court needs to clarify this confusing legal situation.

‘A culture of violence’ and the legacy of R v Brown

Let’s be clear, the kinky acts at play here weren’t 50 Shades of Grey-style fluffy handcuffs and a light spanking. Among the plethora of acts depicted on video were genital torture, branding and bloodletting.

But all of these boundary-pushing acts were consensual. In fact, the slicing and dicing had been going on between the men for over ten years.

Prior to this case, consent by an injured party was seen as a relatively safe “defence” to charges of assault or injury under British law. Previous court decisions on assault and injury offences had found boxing, rough-housing, surgery and macho sporting activities were all justifiable if the person hurt had consented.

But the House of Lords felt that S&M was different implicitly because of its sexual motivation, not to mention that it involved sex between men. Essentially, in the eyes of the law, it’s all fun and games until someone pierces a urethra.

Despite this obvious prejudice, the Lords spend a lot of time in their judgment making it clear that sex was not the major problem – it was the public interest they were concerned with. In the words of Lord Templeman:

Society is entitled and bound to protect itself against a cult of violence. Pleasure derived from the infliction of pain is an evil thing. Cruelty is uncivilised.

It is curious that Lord Templeman did not see a similar “culture of violence” surrounding boxing matches, long approved under law with consent. But his fellow Lords shared his concern regarding cultural effect.

Lord Lowry decried that it was “not in the public interest” that people cause bodily harm “for no good reason”. Pleasure from beating a man senseless was fine, as long as it occurred above the belt.

Over the past 20 years, R v Brown has been heavily critiqued for its misunderstanding of sadomasochism, its obvious homophobia (one of the Lords considered it a “comfort” that a “victim” involved had “settled into a normal heterosexual relationship”) and its reflection on early ’90s social mores.

But it also raises the question of whether consensual sexual acts that “push the boundaries” are at risk of criminalisation in Australia.

The impact of Brown in Australia

If you were to enter an Australian law firm with a whip in one hand and ask the nervous solicitor sitting behind her desk whether S&M was legal, she would probably stutter out something like “kind of”.

Clearly, the police are not overly concerned with what occurs between two consenting adults in their makeshift basement dungeon. Indeed we have seen very few charges laid for consensual S&M acts. But the law regarding such acts in Australia, particularly when actual injury is being inflicted, is quite unclear.

The only relevant Australian cases we have on the subject of consensual S&M involve situations where something has gone wrong and someone has died.

In the Victorian case of R v Stein – a farcical manslaughter case involving a sex worker, a pimp and a consenting client with a taste for bondage – Stein, the “pimp”, had placed a handkerchief gag in the client’s mouth, resulting in his death from suffocation.

In assessing Stein’s appeal of his manslaughter conviction, the court cited R v Brown for the proposition that consent was not relevant to the case, as the victim had suffered “significant physical injury” (namely, death).

Read more: Craig McLachlan, defamation and getting the balance right when sexual harassment goes to court

But how significant does an injury have to be before consent is irrelevant? Is it when a flog breaks the skin? Is it when a life is in danger? Unfortunately, the judiciary has given some mixed signals on the “public interest” line between consensual fun and criminal act.

In Q v Meiers, a man suffocated to death after being bound to a veranda pole with tape by his reluctant wife. In this case, the sentencing judge was highly dismissive of the consensual sadomasochistic activity undertaken, wishing to “make it clear to the community that the Court does denounce [such] conduct”.

This critical view can be contrasted to the judge’s words in R v McIntosh. In this case, a man was asphyxiated by his lover who pulled too hard (and for too long) on a cord wrapped around his neck. Unlike the Meiers case, the sentencing judge in this case made it clear that the sentence delivered was “not based upon any moralistic response to the sexual predilections of those involved in bondage or sadomasochistic activities”.

So, which is it? Are the courts OK with a bit of kink, or concerned about spreading a “culture of violence” in Australia?

Things are made even more confusing as the criminal offences the men were charged with in R v Brown – unlawful wounding and assault occasioning actual bodily harm – are different (but similar to) the assault and injury offences found in Australia. Moreover, UK cases have a “persuasive” rather than “binding” effect on Australian courts. Does this mean that R v Brown is limited to a certain time and place, or does it have a continuing impact on Australian criminal law?

The case for consent

The decision in Brown to place a limit on what two consenting adults can get up to is steeped in outdated views on sadomasochism, sexuality and harm. Given recent discussions about consent, it also highlights the importance of the law recognising the sanctity of consent to sex.

One can accept that amateur bloodletting and testicle clamps are probably not the safest of recreational activities, but a bit of squeamishness should not lead to the criminalisation of bodily autonomy.

Indeed, the best case against the status quo came from one of the two dissenting Lords in R v Brown. Lord Mustill noted the need to leave aside:

repugnance and moral objection, both of which are entirely natural, but neither of which are in my opinion grounds upon which the court could properly create a new crime.

Authors: Jarryd Bartle, Sessional Lecturer in Criminal Law, RMIT University

Read more http://theconversation.com/where-should-the-law-draw-the-line-between-consent-and-culpability-in-sadomasochism-91229

How Your General Dentist Supports Your Smile Over a Lifetime

A healthy grin is more than just a desirable feature; it reflects overall health, well-being, and self-esteem. Our oral health needs evolve from chi...

A Brighter Smile in Sydney: Expert Cosmetic Dentists and Veneers Solutions

A confident smile can open doors, boost your self-esteem, and leave a lasting impression. In Sydney, more people than ever are turning to cosmetic den...

How To Keep Vase Flowers Fresh Through Australia’s Coldest Months

Winter flowers develop slowly, which gives them stronger structure and longer vase life Heat from indoor environments is the biggest threat to th...

Artificial Intelligence is Powering the Growth of Australian Telehealth Services

Many Australians have traditionally experienced difficulties in accessing timely and quality healthcare, especially those who live in rural or remot...

Powering Shepparton’s Businesses: Expert Commercial Electrical Services You Can Count On

When it comes to running a successful business, having reliable, compliant, and efficient electrical systems is non-negotiable. From small retail ou...

Maximise Efficiency: Cleaner Solar Panels for Optimal Performance

Solar panels are a smart investment in energy efficiency, sustainability, and long-term savings—especially here in Cairns, where the tropical sun ...

7 Common Air Conditioner Issues in Melbourne – And How to Fix Them

Image by freepik Living in Melbourne, we all know how unpredictable the weather can be. One moment it’s cold and windy, the next it’s a scorchin...

Powering Palm QLD with Reliable Electrical Solutions

Image by pvproductions on Freepik When it comes to finding a trustworthy electrician Palm QLD locals can count on, the team at East Coast Sparkies s...

The Smart Way to Grow Online: SEO Management Sydney Businesses Can Rely On

If you’re a Sydney-based business owner, you already know the digital space is crowded. But with the right strategy, you don’t need to shout the...

What Your Car Says About You: The Personality Behind the Vehicle

You can tell a lot about someone by the car they drive—or at least, that’s what people think. True Blue Mobile Mechanics reckon the car says a l...

The Confidence Curve: Why Boudoir Photography Is the Empowerment Trend You Didn’t Know You Needed

Boudoir photography has been quietly taking over social feeds, Pinterest boards, and personal milestones—and for good reason. It’s not just abou...

Understanding Level 2 Electricians: Why Sydney Residents Need Licenced Experts for Complex Electrical Work

When it comes to electrical work around the home or business, not all electricians are created equal. In Sydney, particularly when you're dealing wi...

Retirement Anchored in Model Boat Building for Waterford’s Doug Unsold

WATERFORD — When Doug Unsold sees his ship come in, it’s usually one he’s crafted with his own hands. The 67-year-old retiree from Waterford ...

The Science Behind Alarm Clocks and Your Circadian Rhythm

Waking up on time isn’t just about setting an alarm—it’s about working with your body, not against it. At the heart of every restful night and...

How to Use Plants to Create a Calming Atmosphere in Your Home

In today’s fast-paced world, cultivating a calm, soothing environment at home has never been more important. Whether you live in a busy urban apar...

How Maths Tutoring Can Help Students Master Maths

Mathematics can be a daunting subject for many students, often causing stress and frustration. However, maths tutoring has proven to be an effective...

Refurbished iPads Are Better Than New Ones (Here's Why)

Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik Apple's refurbished iPad program has quietly become one of the best deals in tech. While everyone obsesses over the ...

Your Guide to Finding the Right GP: What Perth City Doctors Offer Today

Choosing a General Practitioner (GP) is one of the most important health decisions you’ll make. Luckily, Perth’s vibrant CBD now hosts a new ge...